Alan Stubbs has today revealed his belief in an interesting theory regarding Neil Lennon’s Celtic resignation.
Celtic this morning confirmed the departure of Lennon by stating that he had resigned from the club. This suggests a decision made by the manager and not one that suggests he was forced out.
However, the Daily Record reported last night that crisis talks were held on Tuesday and that Lennon had been informed he was sacked. This version would also tie in with Lennon’s previous comments about rebuilding the club.
And Stubbs, therefore, believes that a private agreement has taken place between Lennon, Dermot Desmond, and Peter Lawwell to agree on how to frame his departure.
Speaking on Sky Sports News [24/02, 11:00], Stubbs said: “To resign today would’ve been a huge sad day for Neil. For what he’s achieved, to walk away from the club and have to resign.
“Because I think there would’ve been some sort of deal done in the background. I don’t think Neil would’ve wanted to resign, and I don’t think Peter Lawwell would’ve wanted to sack Neil. So it wouldn’t surprise me if they’ve both had a heart-to-heart with Neil, Peter Lawwell, and Dermot Desmond, and they’ve come to an agreement or a solution.
“But it’s a sad day for the club and it’s a hugely sad day for Neil.”
No sign of Neil Lennon’s resignation forthcoming before today
This makes 100% sense. Let’s be quite honest here, there would be a few major questions to ask if Lennon did indeed resign.
Firstly, why would he resign given his comments only days ago? Remember, Lennon told the BBC that he sees no reason as to why he wasn’t the man to the rebuild. He pretty much confirmed he was looking to stay on and was almost pitching for it. This isn’t the first time he’s done that either.
Then you would have to ask about the timing. If Lennon had it in his heart to resign, why didn’t he do so before now? Why wait until the campaign was irretrievable? Why wait until there were only eight games remaining? The timing just doesn’t make sense, not when he could’ve saved us by leaving earlier.
It would be too much of a turnaround in attitude and belief from Lennon. Something we know quite simply wouldn’t have been the case.
It reminds me personally of when Ronny Deila resigned in 2016. After losing to Rangers in the Scottish Cup semi-final, he announced his decision to step down at the end of the season. Yet given the severe pressure that was on him, it seemed almost certain that he was sacked instead.
Lennon’s departure today gives you similar vibes. And as Stubbs says, it would hardly be surprising if there were some background discussions on how to frame this.
In other news, we take a look at what we both know and don’t know about Celtic’s recruitment search.
Receive a digest of our best Celtic content each week direct to your mailbox
