Thierry Henry never mentioned Daizen Maeda when explaining one Harry Kane back in October 2025, but his breakdown could not have better illustrated why Celtic’s winner against Hearts was correctly given.
The debate about Maeda’s goal exploded online because many supporters convinced themselves the decision was obvious from a single freeze-frame.
Henry’s Harry Kane analysis explains exactly why that does not tell the full Celtic story.
How much is Daizen Maeda worth now after his post-split form? 🔥📈🔥
Tell us what you think, Celtic fans…🍀💚
Thierry Henry clamped Maeda Celtic goal critics perfectly
In the clip, Henry breaks down Kane’s movement during a Bayern Munich attack and explains why the striker deliberately stayed advanced instead of rushing back onside.
Henry said: “This man [Harry Kane] realised in the first half that they were always pushing too much, so there is no need for you to come here. Just make sure you stay in an offside position.
“Why? Because if they switch the ball and they switch the ball again, you’re going to never be offside. Why? Because you’re going to be behind the ball.
“He’s [Kane] never going to try to come back in onside position, because he knows the ball is going to go, look, normally you kind of coming back here to be onside, he doesn’t care.
“He’s offside, he’s offside, he’s offside, he’s offside. He is not anymore because we all know he’s behind the ball.”
That is the exact principle many ignored when discussing Maeda’s Celtic goal against Hearts.
The Maeda goal used the same logic
The original through ball was not played to Maeda. Callum Osmand collected possession before cutting the ball back across goal.
By the time the final pass was made, Maeda was behind the ball. At that moment, he was onside. It is as simple as that.
The problem was that many reactions online focused entirely on the first phase of play and screenshots that showed Maeda standing beyond the Hearts defence.
Henry’s explanation highlights why that alone does not matter.
VAR got the Celtic decision right
The controversy surrounding the goal was understandable in real time because freeze-frames can make incidents look obvious when they are not.
But the offside law is judged at the precise moment the relevant pass is played, not several seconds earlier in the move.
That is why the goal stood after VAR review and why Henry’s old tactical breakdown is suddenly doing the rounds again among Celtic supporters.
Henry was analysing Harry Kane, but he may have accidentally delivered the perfect defence of Celtic and Maeda in the process.
Receive a digest of our best Celtic content each week direct to your mailbox
