Ally McCoist and Gary Locke shifted the conversation away from football and the title race and into implication during a recent discussion about Celtic, Hearts and Rangers.
Both pundits moved beyond looking at results and fixtures and instead focused on hypothetical scenarios that infer conspiracy theories at a crucial point of the season. The discussion centred on how other teams might approach games involving Celtic and Rangers.
McCoist framed the debate by suggesting there could be a mental aspect at play when Rangers visit Falkirk in the final game of the season. With the title race entering its final fixtures, those claims carry weight beyond simple debate.
The former Rangers striker said, “It’s psychological. I think you make a valid point. It’s a really valid point because if I’m John McGlynn, with the greatest of respect, there’s not a lot on the final game the league campaign particularly if they’re in the Scottish Cup final at the same time, you could argue from Rangers point of view, Celtic playing Hearts in the last game of the season if one of them needed a point or a victory to stop Rangers winning the league, it’s going to be interesting, do you know what I mean?”.
That line of thinking immediately shifts the focus from performance to implication, raising a scenario that is not backed by any evidence or precedent within the discussion itself.
Will we hunt Hearts down and win the title?
Celtic discussion shifts from analysis to implication
The key issue is the implication that teams should field weakened sides as the title race between Celtic, Hearts and Rangers moves onto the last day of the season.
McCoist introduced a situation involving Celtic and Hearts that depends entirely on speculation.
There is no reference to past behaviour, no data, and no example provided to support the idea that such a situation would unfold in the way suggested.
This approach moves the conversation away from what teams have done and into what they might do, which creates doubt without accountability. It invites interpretation rather than delivering insight.
Celtic narratives continue to drift from on-pitch reality
Former Hearts player Locke continued in a similar vein by stating “You touched on it earlier, you know you’ve got Hibs as well who play Celtic and Rangers.
“And on their day, for me Hibs can beat both Celtic and Rangers as well. Would they want to beat Celtic and Rangers to help us? I’m not 100% sure of that either.”.
While the point about Hibs being capable of winning matches is valid, the suggestion that the Easter Road side could somehow throw a game to stop Hearts winning the title crosses the line.
Professional football operates on the expectation that every team competes to win, regardless of what’s happening elsewhere. Moving away from that principle without proof encourages these conspiracies to be peddled.
Across both comments, the pattern is clear within this discussion. The focus moves from analysing performances and results to raising doubts about how teams are likely to approach the final fixtures of the season.
Receive a digest of our best Celtic content each week direct to your mailbox
