Rangers will host Premiership clubs at Ibrox on April 23 to discuss refereeing standards, but the absence of the Scottish FA creates a situation Celtic cannot afford to ignore.
The planned summit follows Rangers opening talks with head of referees Willie Collum and pushing the issue onto the SPFL board agenda, signalling a clear attempt to shape the direction of refereeing discussion in Scotland.
Clubs are already contributing more than £1.2m annually towards VAR, yet dissatisfaction remains widespread throughout the Scottish Premiership, with delays and inconsistency continuing to dominate the conversation.
This is no longer just about decisions on the pitch, it is about who controls the process behind them.
Should VAR be scrapped in Scotland? Vote now!
John McGinn wants it gone. Do you agree?
Celtic must recognise the imbalance in Rangers-led talks
The structure of this meeting matters more than the agenda, and the absence of the Scottish FA and the fact that this is a Rangers-led meeting should set alarm bells ringing for Celtic.
Rangers are setting the tone of the discussion, while the governing body responsible for referees is not present to shape or challenge those proposals.
That leaves any agreement lacking authority in the short term, but still capable of influencing how future decisions are framed before they reach SFA channels.
Celtic have already seen how interpretation and review processes can shift against them, with recent VAR-related incidents highlighting ongoing concerns around consistency.
Celtic face wider consequences beyond refereeing debate
The concern is not limited to refereeing standards alone, as Rangers have indicated a willingness to increase financial input to improve decision making systems.
That introduces a new layer to the discussion, where influence is not only about opinion but also about which clubs are prepared to fund change.
Not every Premiership side will agree on spending more, particularly when the current VAR system already costs clubs over £1.2m each year.
Differences in camera coverage between fixtures, with some games operating on the minimum and others using significantly more angles, underline how uneven the current setup already is.
Celtic have their own recent evidence of how VAR decisions can impact results, with controversy surrounding Auston Trusty’s red card and the subsequent review process raising further questions about consistency.
Those incidents have already prompted strong reactions around how the system is applied, reinforcing that the issue is directly affecting results.
If proposals are shaped in environments where not all stakeholders are present, the risk is that a clear refereeing direction is set before full scrutiny is applied.
That would leave Celtic reacting to changes rather than influencing them, despite being one of the clubs most affected by the current refereeing system.
The next step may involve clubs presenting a unified position to the Scottish FA, but the direction of travel is already being established.
Celtic cannot afford to step back while that process unfolds.
The balance of influence about refereeing in Scottish football is shifting, and that carries consequences well beyond one meeting.
Receive a digest of our best Celtic content each week direct to your mailbox
