Celtic’s attacking balance has come under scrutiny again, and the win over St Mirren at Hampden just exposed it. One player is doing exactly what the system demands, while others are falling short in the most basic areas of forward play.
There is no mystery around what Martin O’Neill expects from his wide players at Celtic. Movement, intent, and a willingness to take risks in possession are non-negotiable in this system.
Yet the gap between expectation and execution is growing clearer with each performance. It is not a tactical issue, it is a personnel one.
James Forrest’s approach has exposed that gap, and the difference is now being called out directly after his direct involvement in Celtic’s win over St Mirren.
Should Celtic offer James Forrest a contract extension?
Let us know in the comments!
Celtic’s wide play lacks intent and James Forrest highlights it
Steven Thompson and Pat Bonner were speaking about Forrest during Celtic’s win and made the point clearly when assessing his attacking intent compared to his teammates.
Bonner said, “The thing about Forrest is he doesn’t just play out on that right hand side. You know, when Brendan had him away at the very start, I think even he was always drifting into those positions, getting into positions where he could actually have a shot on goal. Just similar to that situation.
And Thompson replied, “The difference is that he when he’s on the ball, wants to try and make things happen. He doesn’t play it safe. He wants to try and see a pass take a player on. Too many of the Celtic players don’t do that. Do you agree?”
That assessment cuts straight to the core of the issue. The problem is not system or structure, it is a lack of attacking intent from too many players in key areas.
Forrest is being held up as the example because he does what is required without hesitation. He takes responsibility in possession and looks to move the game forward.
James Forrest still delivers what Celtic wingers are missing
Bonner also reinforced the contrast in decision making when discussing wider squad habits. He said, “I totally agree. You know, that’s what I said about Tounekti. How many times does he turn back and get the ball back to another player?”
He then made the distinction clear with Forrest’s approach. “Forrest will do it only when it’s necessary.”
This is the difference that now stands out. Forrest is taking risks at the right moments, while other Celtic teammates are defaulting to safety.
This is not about reputation or past contribution. It is about execution in the present, and right now Forrest is showing exactly what Celtic are missing in wide areas.
Receive a digest of our best Celtic content each week direct to your mailbox
