67 Hail Hail has looked into the amount of money that Celtic are likely to have left over following the end of the winter transfer window.
Five players joined the Hoops in total, all of them on loan, but some with options to buy.
Before the start of January, 67 Hail Hail knew that Dermot Desmond was sitting on a pile of cash that was ready to be spent.
A change in manager meant a change of approach in the market and no money spent on any permanent signings.
With extra cash obtained through qualifying for the next stage of the Europa League to come too, our Chief Finance expert Adam Williams took a deep dive into the accounts to see how much the Hoops are likely to have left over.
- READ MORE: 67 Hail Hail fans send their message to Dermot Desmond after transfer window shuts for the season
What would your message to Dermot Desmond be now that the transfer window has closed
Dermot Desmond appearing to be cautious with cash reserves
It will come as no surprise that there is money in the bank at Celtic Park.
However, Desmond and the rest of the board seem to be more fearful of future seasons without Champions League money and are hesitant to spend too much of those.
Williams revealed that money is likely to be generating interest and that there is still a war chest available if ever needed.
He told 67 Hail Hail: “There is nothing wrong with generating a cash surplus. There are a lot of clubs who are in big trouble because, while they have increased their revenue several times over, they immediately burn that cash – plus further subsidies from the owners – on wages, transfers and agents’ fees.
“However, what we’re seeing at Celtic is something different. The ownership’s argument, as far as I can tell, is that they need their cash reserves to be strong for years when they don’t qualify for the Champions League. That’s a very fair point, but equally you’re unlikely to regularly qualify for the Champions League if you don’t adequately strengthen the squad. Having that squad churn and generating regular player sale profits is important, yes, but they don’t need to be a so-called ‘selling club’ because they generate consistent operating profits before player trading almost every year anyway.
“They had £77m in the bank per the last set of accounts. They are generating some interest on that cash, but they are also paying a lot more proportionately in tax. Then, you have dividends paid to shareholders. That’s not a huge expense, but it does make a difference.
You can pick one member of the Celtic board to banish…
Who do you pick first?
“You could forgive the hoarding of cash if Celtic were doing well on the pitch, but they aren’t. There are very few managers, sporting directors and executives who can turn around a club through some miracle of alchemy – at the end of the day, change almost always requires further investment as well as an accompanying re-think of strategy. That kind of vision is in short supply at Celtic.
“In terms of what their cash balance will be after the January transfer window, you need to consider a few things. Yes, they have less European revenue this season, but I think they will also have spent less on infrastructure after two consecutives years of pretty high spending in this department. It’s difficult to estimate cash flow without seeing how transfers in and out of the club are structured, but I think they will probably end the season with a slightly lower cash balance than the 2024-25 accounts. I don’t think the drop-off will be too significant – if I had to put a number on it, I’d say £70m, depending on what they do in Europe. The board can say that is a testament to their strategy of hoarding cash, but fans will argue – justifiably, in my view – that a strong balance sheet won’t stay strong if you’re consistently wilting on the pitch.“
Receive a digest of our best Celtic content each week direct to your mailbox
